
Reward Gateway | Edenred research reports a rise in frequent burnout from 23 to 28 percent. An analysis of how post-summer workloads impact executive capacity.

On September 24, 2026, Personnel Today published an analysis on seasonal workplace stress detailing a steady climb in employee exhaustion. The report highlights findings from Reward Gateway | Edenred indicating that frequent burnout among workers increased from 23 percent in 2023 to 28 percent in recent results. Frequent stress also saw a corresponding rise, climbing from 33 percent to 37 percent over the same period. For founders and executives, these figures offer a clear warning about the final quarter of the year.
The data stems from Reward Gateway | Edenred’s “Building Human Workplaces” research, which explores how seasonal transitions affect employee capacity. The underlying thesis of the Personnel Today article, authored by Chris Britton, is that September acts as a distinct pressure point rather than just another month on the calendar. This seasonal shift forces employees to navigate a sudden increase in work demands just as the psychological benefits of summer holidays begin to fade. The collision of high expectations and depleted post-summer energy creates a difficult transition.
Hedonic contrast is used to describe the friction of returning to ordinary workplace demands after a highly enjoyable break. When the positive mood associated with a holiday fades within days of returning to the office, ordinary tasks can feel unusually heavy by comparison. This friction is further compounded by the fresh start effect, which refers to the psychological tendency to pursue major changes at meaningful beginnings. Unfinished work from the summer months adds immediate weight to these new initiatives, overwhelming teams before the quarter truly begins.
The article notes claims that workplace productivity drops by roughly 20 percent during the summer, while employees become up to 45 percent more distracted. These dynamics require leaders to clearly separate acute stress from chronic overload when evaluating team health. Acute stress is a short-term physiological response to immediate pressure, which can sometimes aid focus during brief projects. However, chronic stress develops when psychological demands continue for a prolonged period without any meaningful chance for recovery.
The article describes burnout as a later-stage collapse associated with prolonged strain, rather than simply another word for ordinary stress. The World Health Organization reinforces this distinction by classifying burnout in its ICD-11 manual strictly as an occupational phenomenon resulting from unmanaged chronic workplace stress. It is not classified as a general medical condition, underscoring that the root cause lies in the work environment itself.
Many leaders assume that time off automatically resets team capacity, but the data suggests that returning to an unmanaged workload quickly erases those gains. Personnel Today argues that September requires deliberate workforce planning rather than a simple expectation for employees to resume normal duties. Managers should hold honest conversations with their teams to understand individual needs and make reasonable adjustments where possible.
One effective tool recommended in the research is the use of informal stay conversations. These discussions allow managers to identify problems before employees reach the point of disengagement or departure. Anonymous surveys are presented as another method for detecting concerns that employees may not feel comfortable raising publicly. However, the article cautions that employers should only use these surveys if they are fully prepared to act on uncomfortable findings.
I spent a week at a popular health optimization conference and left completely exhausted by the complexity. Everyone was pushing a new supplement protocol, a complicated gadget, or a rigid daily routine. It struck me that true high performers do not have time to make health a full time job. They need maximum return on minimum viable effort, which means fixing the systemic source of workload stress before adding more self-care tasks.
Executives should treat the post-summer transition as a necessary checkpoint for capacity and prioritisation. A practical response proposed by Reward Gateway | Edenred is a workload amnesty. During this amnesty, teams actively identify low-value work, absorb the post-summer backlog, and ruthlessly prioritise the activities that matter most. Leaders must also clarify working hours, contact expectations, and response-time norms for both office-based and remote teams.
The article argues that clear expectations make it significantly easier for employees to disconnect outside of contactable hours. Setting these boundaries ensures that energy and productivity can be sustained over the long term without leading to burnout. Leaders must also learn to separate performance problems from capacity problems. A previously high-performing employee who becomes slower, less focused, or less engaged may be facing chronic overload rather than a sudden motivation deficit.
The article describes a dangerous feedback loop in which reduced productivity leads people to work longer hours, sleep less, and become increasingly fatigued. High-responsibility roles often conceal the earliest signs of strain, making it critical for executives to look beyond obvious absenteeism. Jessica Stillman, an Inc columnist cited in the research, describes a state of quiet cracking. This is a form of disengagement where individuals continue to appear functional, keeping it together and smiling while exhaustion begins to show through. For founders, stress resilience and sustainable performance rely on spotting these leading indicators before they result in silent turnover.
The scale of this organisational challenge is evident when looking at broader public health figures. According to data from the Health and Safety Executive cited by workplace health sources, 964,000 UK workers were affected by work-related stress, depression, or anxiety during the 2024 to 2025 period. This significant burden resulted in approximately 22.1 million lost working days across Britain. The HSE figures underscore just how dominant stress has become as a factor in overall employee wellbeing.
Work-related stress, depression, and anxiety accounted for 52 percent of all work-related ill health during the reported period. Furthermore, these conditions were responsible for 62 percent of all working days lost to work-related ill health. Additional research aligns with this focus on structural work conditions. The CIPD’s 2025 Health and Wellbeing at Work findings, as reported by REBA, identify excessive workloads, intense pressure, and management styles as commonly cited causes of stress-related absence.
Labour market movements also reflect this late-summer friction, though causation remains complex. According to the Personnel Today report, UK job adverts increased by 7 percent between August and September 2025. During this same window, hiring increased in 21 of 26 measured job groups. While these figures highlight significant workforce mobility during the early autumn, they serve as a backdrop to the wider conversation about employee retention and wellbeing.
While these findings highlight clear risks, executives must view the data with necessary intellectual honesty. The underlying Reward Gateway | Edenred research is proprietary company research presented in a company-affiliated publication. The summary available in Personnel Today does not disclose the sample size, geographic scope, or respondent demographics of the survey. The article also omits the survey fieldwork dates and the precise questionnaire wording used to define frequent burnout.
Because of these omissions, the reported 5 percentage point rise in burnout should not be presented as a definitive estimate of the entire global workforce. The results show a reported change over time, but they do not establish that September or any single workplace factor directly caused the increase. The summer productivity statistics cited in the article lack independent verifiability. The claims that workplace productivity drops by about 20 percent during the summer and that employees become up to 45 percent more distracted are presented without identifying the underlying study or its methodology.
Additionally, the reported increase in job adverts shows labour-market movement but does not prove that burnout caused more people to seek work. Finally, the claim that burnout peaks in September is an editorial framing rather than a scientifically measured absolute. The article does not provide a September-specific prevalence figure to prove it is objectively the worst month across all workplaces. It is also crucial to recognise that frequent stress and clinical conditions are distinct concepts, and the research does not suggest that burnout, anxiety, and depression are interchangeable diagnoses.
The conversation around workplace capacity and executive support is slowly maturing beyond simple individual interventions. The Mental Health Foundation argues that employers should address excessive workloads and under-resourcing as organisational risks rather than treating mental health primarily as an individual resilience problem. This aligns with the HSE framework, which defines work-related stress as an adverse reaction to excessive pressures and demands. Future approaches to high performance will likely shift toward structural job design and comprehensive care systems.
The most effective strategies will combine preventive changes to workloads with highly accessible, responsive support networks. Companies that succeed will integrate mental-health awareness and resilience training alongside confidential workplace counselling, employee assistance programmes, and fast access to effective psychological treatment. Leaders who publicly model sustainable habits and respect communication boundaries will set the standard for modern executive teams. A corporate benefit has limited practical value if employees do not know it exists or fear using it without judgement. By treating executive performance as a function of well-designed work rather than endless endurance, organisations can build teams capable of handling intense demands without collapsing.
Stay connected for research and practical guidance on executive performance, energy, focus, sleep, recovery and longevity. Ideas built for people who want to stay sharp, capable and effective for the long run.



Build habits and systems that support clear thinking, steady energy and long term capacity throughout a demanding career.
explore the Blog