A recent survey of India's startup ecosystem reveals 54.3% of employees scored below the study's low-wellbeing threshold. Learn the impact of psychological safety.
On October 8, 2026, publications including ETHRWorld and CNBC-TV18 detailed the findings of a new survey examining the mental state of India's startup ecosystem. The comprehensive report, titled State of Mind: The Startup Ecosystem, assessed 823 professionals across various organizational roles. The final data revealed that 47.5 percent of all respondents fell below the study's specific threshold for low wellbeing. The research challenges the traditional narrative of the struggling founder by indicating that startup employees actually carry the heaviest burden.
The State of Mind study was initiated by Sheetal Bahl, a founder and partner at Merak Ventures. The formal report was authored by Priyanka Kartari, Dr Sukhmani Pal, and Dr Dilip Panniker. The researchers analyzed a self-selected sample of 823 retained respondents, gathered from an initial pool of 1,040 submissions. This group included 347 founders or co-founders, 300 startup employees, 124 investors, and 52 ecosystem supporters.
To assess the participants, the authors used an adapted version of the World Health Organization's five-item Well-Being Index. They established an original WHO-5 score of 50 as their definitive cutoff point for low wellbeing. The distribution of low scores across different roles provides the study's most striking operational insight.
While founder burnout dominates media discussions, startup employees reported the highest share of individuals below the threshold at 54.3 percent. By comparison, 45.2 percent of investors and 44.2 percent of ecosystem supporters fell below the designated cutoff. Founders actually reported the lowest proportion among the surveyed groups, with 42.9 percent scoring under the threshold. According to CNBC-TV18, founders experienced the highest overall levels of worry, while employees demonstrated lower energy and engagement without a corresponding rise in worry.
For leaders building high-growth organizations, these findings demand a rigorous review of internal communication and support structures. The most critical operational takeaway centers entirely on psychological safety. The report identified this factor as the variable most strongly associated with respondent wellbeing. Overall, 34.8 percent of surveyed individuals stated they did not feel safe acknowledging their workplace struggles.
This widespread communication gap creates a severe organizational vulnerability for rapidly scaling businesses. Executives attempting to maintain stress resilience and sustainable performance cannot resolve operational friction they are not permitted to see. The impact of this safety deficit is particularly severe among the employee cohort. Among surveyed employees, an overwhelming 88.3 percent of those who felt unsafe speaking up scored below the wellbeing threshold.
In sharp contrast, only 26.7 percent of employees who felt safe speaking up fell below that exact same mark. This distinct difference suggests that a culture of open communication is a structural requirement for sustained operational capacity. Leaders must actively design internal systems where concerns can be raised without fear of negative professional consequences. A passive approach to team feedback is clearly insufficient for demanding high-stress environments.
Furthermore, the data points to a dangerous discrepancy between self-perception and measured reality. The study noted that 391 total respondents scored below the established wellbeing cutoff. However, 35.3 percent of this specific group still confidently described themselves as thriving or doing okay. This mismatch indicates that self-reported status is a fundamentally unreliable metric for actual cognitive and physical capacity.
Ambitious professionals frequently mask their exhaustion to maintain their standing within competitive teams. They may report positive outcomes in check-ins while simultaneously experiencing severe operational friction. Founders must look far beyond superficial meetings when evaluating executive performance and long-term team health. The true measure of organizational endurance requires objective observation of daily workflows.
The research provided concrete numerical outcomes related to work volume and the utilization of professional support. According to CNBC-TV18, the study found a clear association between longer working hours and lower overall wellbeing scores. Among respondents working 50 or more hours a week, 51 percent were at or below the established threshold. The proportion dropped to 43 percent for those working between 40 and 50 hours, and 37 percent for those working under 40 hours.
Despite the high volume of respondents scoring below the threshold, formal interventions remained relatively rare across the ecosystem. The report stated that only 15.1 percent of surveyed individuals had actively sought professional help for their struggles. This massive gap between measured distress and active professional intervention highlights a clear area for immediate organizational improvement. Companies looking to support energy and productivity must reduce the friction involved in accessing proper mental health resources.
While these findings provide valuable structural insights, the underlying data carries significant methodological limitations. First, the survey was entirely anonymous and self-selected. The original pool of 1,040 responses was filtered down to 823 after basic attention checks and exclusions were applied. The available reporting does not provide specific survey field dates, which limits our understanding of the timeline.
There is also insufficient information to establish that this sample accurately represents the entirety of India's massive startup ecosystem. Operators should view these percentages as specific to this sample rather than universal industry benchmarks. Additionally, the study's primary measurement tools require careful and cautious interpretation by evaluating bodies. The adapted WHO-5 instrument used a 50-point cutoff that had not been independently validated for this specific adaptation.
The reported low-wellbeing threshold is purely a study measure and absolutely does not constitute a clinical diagnosis. Furthermore, the survey findings demonstrate association rather than strict causation. The data shows that feeling unsafe is heavily linked to lower scores, but it does not definitively prove that one directly causes the other. The exact same associational limit applies to the reported data regarding working hours and employee burnout.
The broader conversation around startup health is gradually maturing beyond the reliance on individual grit. Sheetal Bahl noted that the study initiative grew from his own mental health challenges and a short sabbatical taken in 2025. Following his personal experience, he organized dedicated conversations and meetups in Delhi, Bengaluru, and Mumbai. Bahl argued that the survey results demonstrate an urgent need for practical, systemic changes.
He recommended creating safer channels for speaking up, providing actual support, and ensuring genuine time off for all team members. Moving forward, we can expect greater scrutiny of organizational design in early-stage companies and investment portfolios. ETHRWorld noted additional practical recommendations like anonymous wellbeing assessments, confidential support, and specific manager training. Investors and board members may begin including broader team wellbeing in their routine portfolio company conversations.
However, boards must avoid treating this single self-selected survey as a definitive benchmark for any one specific company. Future clinical research will be necessary to validate these organizational interventions and establish resilient operational frameworks. Adapting corporate structures to meet these realities will remain a defining challenge for the next generation of business leaders.
Stay connected for research and practical guidance on executive performance, energy, focus, sleep, recovery and longevity. Ideas built for people who want to stay sharp, capable and effective for the long run.
Build habits and systems that support clear thinking, steady energy and long term capacity throughout a demanding career.
explore the Blog
